01
Follow the route a visitor takes.
Read the site in sequence. Start where a new visitor lands, check how the offer is explained, follow the primary action, then repeat the journey on a small screen and visit a page that does not exist.
Clarity before change
A redesign can make a website feel new without resolving the decision underneath it. It can also remove patterns that were already doing useful work. Start with what visitors understand, where the journey gets in the way and what should be preserved.
Start in the right place
Write the decision in one sentence before discussing pages, colours or components. Are you trying to clarify the offer, help a particular visitor act, support a changed business or repair trust in an important journey? Only then can you judge whether a redesign is the answer at all.
01
Read the site in sequence. Start where a new visitor lands, check how the offer is explained, follow the primary action, then repeat the journey on a small screen and visit a page that does not exist.
02
Several awkward moments often share one cause. Rewriting five calls to action will not help if the offer itself is unclear. Name the underlying issue, then decide which symptoms it explains.
03
Find the page, message or interaction that already works best. “What to leave alone” lowers the risk of replacing good work and gives the redesign a benchmark.
Record the unknowns
A public review can show what the pages say and how the visible journey behaves. It cannot tell you which traffic source converts best, where real customers abandon a form, what research has already found or which internal constraint shaped the build.
Keep those as open questions. Use analytics, customer conversations or authorised internal evidence before turning an inference into a requirement.
Read the public-evidence boundary →Prioritise before briefing
One to three changes tied to the highest-consequence evidence.
Useful work that depends on, or becomes clearer after, the first move.
Real issues whose delay is safe, with the reason written down.
Working pages, messages and interactions the change must protect.
A short pre-redesign review
This is a decision checklist, not a promise that every item needs changing.
Use it when the evidence points to a few isolated problems and the underlying structure remains sound.
Consider it when the same root cause runs through navigation, hierarchy, content and repeated patterns—not merely because the site feels old.
Choose this when the important question depends on evidence the public website cannot provide.
These are decision prompts, not guarantees. The right route depends on the evidence available and the consequence of getting it wrong.
GreatInternet gives you an independent read of the public website: what matters, what to preserve and the next sensible step. We do not sell the rebuild.